We surveyed 42 Solana founders. Here’s what they said.

Solana founders anonymously weigh in on other teams, VCs, and the alleged cabal

article-image

Solana and Adobe stock modified by Blockworks

share


This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


Lightspeed put together an anonymous survey and circulated it to Solana founders to get an honest peek into what they think of other ecosystems, VCs, startups and more.

The questions included a range of choices and a write-in slot that has been edited for grammar and clarity. 

The results from our 42-founder poll:

Founders also said:

None. If not solana, I wouldn’t be in crypto.”

Founders also said:

“Unfair to choose a single one”

Founders also said:

“Asia-based VCs who only ape in based off who the lead is”

Founders also said:

“I don’t know, either way, doesn’t really matter”

“Not a fan of this question, feels like it’s trying to provoke rather than inform”

“Exists, I am a part of it, but not “at the expense of non-cabal projects” because I invest a lot of time and money into “non-cabal projects” as well. It’s a two-way street — you give and you receive.”

“Does not exist and I am a part of it”

“There’s a network of personal relationships that have formed naturally during the early days and bear market. Folks who valued working together and helping solana over the years naturally have a tighter network now. Some of these people (individuals include folks from the OG solana labs team) have gone on to find a large voice and following. This is natural. Almost all of the surviving teams have also been funded by VCs and solana ventures money. Those are facts, but there’s no ill intent in my opinion. Solana Foundation is doing a great job at actively dispersing the resulting effects and supporting people throughout the wider ecosystem (see Superteam, etc). In my opinion, Toly specifically is doing a great job at shouting out builders without discrimination but rather based on 1) what they’re building being cool 2) earnestness”

Founders also said:

“Need much more blockspace ASAP. 5x demand + 2x price appreciation = need 10x bigger blocks to maintain the same cost for app builders!”

Founders also said:

“The one that does not accelerate”

Founders also said: 

“SocialFi, DeSci, and gaming are all equally terrible”

Founders also said:

“FTX was both the best in the early days and the worst lol.”


There’s a lot to dig into here, but there are a couple findings I found immediately interesting: Other founders don’t think highly of pump.fun, yet they think memecoins are mostly good for the ecosystem. And, Base and Sui appear to be by far the most alluring Solana competitors. 

As a journalist, it can be difficult to get founders to be candid with me on the record. This was a helpful exercise in learning what Solana founders really believe — at least in the aggregate.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Old Billingsgate

Mon - Wed, October 13 - 15, 2025

Blockworks’ Digital Asset Summit (DAS) will feature conversations between the builders, allocators, and legislators who will shape the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the US and abroad.

Industry City | Brooklyn, NY

TUES - THURS, JUNE 24 - 26, 2025

Permissionless IV serves as the definitive gathering for crypto’s technical founders, developers, and builders to come together and create the future.If you’re ready to shape the future of crypto, Permissionless IV is where it happens.

Brooklyn, NY

SUN - MON, JUN. 22 - 23, 2025

Blockworks and Cracked Labs are teaming up for the third installment of the Permissionless Hackathon, happening June 22–23, 2025 in Brooklyn, NY. This is a 36-hour IRL builder sprint where developers, designers, and creatives ship real projects solving real problems across […]

recent research

Research Report Templates.png

Research

Maple Finance has successfully navigated significant market challenges through its strategic pivot to secured lending (Maple v2) and the launch of its Syrup product. Syrup has become a primary growth driver, delivering sustainable, outperforming stablecoin yields and rapidly increasing TVL. The upcoming custody-first Bitcoin staking product (istBTC) presents another significant avenue for expansion. Crucially, Maple has achieved operational profitability, a key inflection point that, combined with a fully vested token and active buyback mechanism, strengthens its investment case. While valuation metrics suggest potential undervaluation relative to peers and growth, the primary forward-looking risk identified is the long-term sustainability of its current high-take-rate collateral staking revenue model.

article-image

In 2014, Microsoft virus scanners were detecting viruses in Bitcoin software

article-image

Ledn’s Mauricio Di Bartolomeo explained how this cycle’s been different for the lender

article-image

The shorts looking for funding range from charming animated series to gritty live-action dramas

article-image

Money, it turns out, is emergent, like consciousness

article-image

Bridge flows churn in both directions as risk appetite returns

article-image

Even with an uncertain outlook thanks to tariffs, Big Tech executives are still ramping up their AI investments